Secret Service Outsources IT to IT Incompetent Foreign-Influenced Company
By
Duane Thresher, Ph.D. April 23, 2018
The Secret Service is tasked with protecting President Trump's
life. Like it or not, President Trump is hated even by our
closest allies, who make no secret about wanting him dead.
These days protecting the President involves a lot of Internet
work. You would reasonably expect that this work would be
done by the highest-grade IT people, people not from foreign
countries. But incredibly, the Secret Service outsources this
work to an IT incompetent foreign-influenced company,
LookingGlass Cyber Solutions.
Recently, I was looking at the web logs for Apscitu's website.
This is basic critical IT security practice since websites are
the leading attack vector for hackers.
A web log is simply a file that tells you about who accessed
your website. It usually contains at least their IP address,
the date and time they came, what they did (e.g., what webpage
they looked at), what website they came from, and the device
type they used.
Using readily available IP to location services, you can then
find their location and often the organization they are
from.
Besides security, web logs can also be used for web analytics,
to see how successful a website is (i.e., how many people
visited) and thus what advertising rates can be charged. In
fact, judging from the increasing number and seriousness of
data breaches, web logs seem to be mostly used for web
analytics.
Google Analytics is the most popular web analytics but they
censor the visitor IP addresses. Further, they seem to do a
poor job of filtering out robots (particularly the many robots
hosted by Amazon). As the name indicates, robots are
non-human visitors to a website. But human visitors are what
website owners really care about. Robots are to automatically
determine the content of websites. They are what Google and
other search engines use. If Google Analytics can't correctly
identify visitors as robots, it wrongly inflates the number of
human visitors to the website, which is lying to
advertisers.
Because of all this, and because I
don't
trust Google in general, I look at my web logs myself.
Recently I discovered IP address 209.0.146.204 was looking at
my article
Fake
Federal Facebook Fury Finally Finished, including (it was
actually looked at first) my U.S. Senators Facebook Accounts
table.
Looking up 209.0.146.204 in an IP to location service, I found
it was from Cyveillance, out of Arlington Virginia, near
Washington D.C. A little more research showed that
Cyveillance owns the IP addresses 209.0.146.0 to 209.0.146.255
(that's 254 individual IP addresses; .0 and .255 are not used
individually).
From a Department of Homeland Security (the Secret Service's
department) December 2012 document "U.S. Secret Service Cyber
Awareness Program (Cyveillance)", it was found that
"Cyveillance, a subsidiary of QinetiQ of North America, is
under contract by the Secret Service to search available
information related to the Secret Service and its
missions."
QinetiQ is a foreign corporation. Congress has forbidden IT
by Russian and Chinese companies. (Note that the Constitution
requires the President to have been born in the U.S., exactly
because of this concern about foreign influence.)
QinetiQ is British. But, you say, Britain (UK, United
Kingdom) is one of our closest allies. The NSA includes it in
the Five Eyes (FVEY) alliance of the U.S., Britain, Canada,
Australia, and New Zealand (the English-speaking
countries).
However, many in Britain, including in the government (they
have their own entrenched leftist bureaucracy), have expressed
their desire to see President Trump dead. Further, the NSA
classifies a lot of data as NOFORN, meaning no foreign
distribution, even to the others in the Five Eyes
alliance.
And incredibly, Cyveillance looked at my article about
senators' Facebook accounts but never looked at my article
Secret
Service, Spectre Hacker Threatens Trump With God's
Justice, about me actually reporting a threat to President
Trump to the Secret Service! Why were they more interested in
senators' Facebook accounts than a threat to President
Trump?
In December 2015, Cyveillance was sold to LookingGlass Cyber
Solutions. In fact, www.Cyveillance.com redirects to
www.LookingGlassCyber.com.
LookingGlass (Looking Glass is the flying command and control
center in case of nuclear war) appears to be American-owned.
However, among other officers, the Chief Technology Officer
(CTO; LookingGlass does not have a CIO, it has a CTO instead),
Allan Thomson, is from the UK. (I am a natural U.S. citizen,
born and raised on U.S. Air Force bases.)
If the Secret Service would not accept Allan Thomson as an
agent protecting the President, they should not accept him as
head of their IT. I doubt he even had a background
check.
Further, Allan Thomson is IT incompetent for this level of IT:
he's the head of IT for the company doing the IT work for the
Secret Service, which protects the President's
life.
I checked Allan Thomson's background out from his LinkedIn
page, which is probably all the Secret Service checked if they
checked him at all. LinkedIn pages are of course often
exaggerated.
Allan
Thomson at most has a BS in computer science. Although
this is better than the BA in Russian for
Equifax
data breach CIO
David
Webb or the BA in music composition for Equifax data
breach CISO
Susan
Mauldin, it is still shockingly unqualified for this level
of IT. (Who am I to say this? I have a BS in Electrical
Engineering and Computer Science and an MS and PhD in
supercomputing.)
Plus Allan Thomson's BS is from Britain's University of
Glasgow, which is only ranked #102 globally by U.S. News &
World Report. (Two of my universities, both in the U.S., are
in the top 10 globally: MIT (BS), #2; Columbia (PhD),
#8.)
For years, Allan Thomson worked for other companies, including
networking giant Cisco, although only because Cisco bought the
company he worked for before. However, someone working
unqualified for years for a company is not itself a
qualification, it is a condemnation of the company that hired
him. Exactly the same as for Equifax data breach CIO Dave
Webb and Equifax data breach CISO Susan Mauldin.
While it's true that in the kingdom of the blind the one-eyed
man is king, when there are available men with 20/10 vision in
both eyes one of them should be king.
It's a near certainty that those IT people working under
LookingGlass CTO Allan Thomson are even less qualified. An
indication of this is from them checking out Apscitu's
website. IT Surveillance 101 is never to let who you are
checking out know you are doing it, but I easily discovered
Cyveillance via their IP address. Using Tor or even simply
using a common commercial ISP would have prevented that.
Clowns.
I would suggest renaming LookingGlass LaughingGas but
protecting the President's life is no laughing matter, or at
least it shouldn't be. I wouldn't even recommend LookingGlass
for all of the other government agencies and companies it
claims to work for. In fact, I would strongly recommend
against LookingGlass.
[Update: A little more digging, since it seems to be one of
the Secret Service's more closely held secrets, uncovered the
actual Secret Service Chief Information Officer, Kevin
Nally, who only has a BS in agronomy and crop science and
a Master's in ship building.]