Russia and Restaurant Manager Bonnie Titone Duke IT Out Over Forced Meltdowns of Carolina Nuclear Power Plants
By
Duane Thresher, Ph.D. January 28, 2022
As I have written, in
Nuclear
9/11 for example, Russia, led by President Vladimir Putin,
would love to attack the U.S. by hacking into nuclear power
plants and forcing meltdowns, since it would prove that a
catastrophic meltdown like Chernobyl in 1986 can't only happen
to them. As it did in the hacking and ransomwaring of
Colonial Pipeline (see
U.S. Surrenders
in IT War, Starts Paying Tribute to Russia), Russia will
do this by determining the
IT incompetent,
regardless of sex or race (i.e.
diversity),
of those who are supposed to protect us from such cyberattacks
— e.g. Chief Information Officers (CIOs) of nuclear
power plants — and hacking into and forcing meltdowns of
those insecure nuclear power plants. IT incompetent
Marie
Mouchet is the hacked woman CIO of Colonial Pipeline, and
before that she was CIO of Southern Nuclear, which operates
three nuclear power plants in Georgia and Alabama; IT
incompetent
Martin
Davis is the black CIO of Southern Nuclear now (see
also
Ransomwared
Nuclear Power Plants Upwind of Major U.S. Cities). Lest
this be taken as a condemnation of the South, I wrote
in
Hacking
and Forced Meltdown of Nuclear Power Plants: Upwind of
Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia about IT incompetent
woman CIO
Kelly
Lyman of PECO, which operates the notoriously insecure
Peach Bottom nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania. Here I
write about
IT
incompetent — she only has a BS in restaurant
management — Bonnie Titone, who is the woman CIO of Duke
Energy, which operates six nuclear power plants spread
throughout some of the most densely populated areas of North
and South Carolina. Forced meltdowns of these old and
already-unsafe nuclear power plants, and the resulting spread
of radiation by wind and water, could horribly kill hundreds
of thousands by radiation sickness.
Apscitu can prevent
this.
According to a Duke Energy press release,
Bonnie Titone
was hired as Duke Energy's Chief
Information Officer (CIO) in June 2019. "She will oversee
Duke Energy’s information technology operations and
infrastructure", which would include IT security (
a.k.a. cybersecurity,
i.e. preventing hacking) of Duke Energy's nuclear power
plants.
Bonnie Titone is IT incompetent since she has no IT education;
see
The
Most Important IT Credential: An IT Education in
Principles of IT
Incompetence. According to Bonnie Titone's own LinkedIn
page, she only has a BS in hotel and restaurant management.
This would include, for example, Motel 6 and McDonald's
management. I've stayed in many hotels and motels and
considered myself lucky if the Wi-Fi Internet access worked at
all. No one should have to consider themselves lucky if their
neighboring nuclear power plant isn't hacked into and forced
to melt down.
As I have written, in
Nuclear
9/11 for example, if a nuclear power plant is hacked into,
a meltdown can be caused. All parts of a nuclear power plant,
particularly the reactor control rods and cooling system, are
controlled by computers and connected by a network, since
humans can't be near many of these parts. Even hacking just
the networked sensors could be used to force a meltdown by
tricking the computers.
In
Nuclear
9/11, I also explained about the horrors of radiation
sickness, specifically the effects, including death rates, of
different dosages of radiation. This assumed no medical
treatment, but as was made clear from Coronavirus, for the
millions affected there would be no medical treatment.
(Speaking of Coronavirus, it is currently being used to scare
people and make them ignore far more deadly dangers, like
hacking and forced meltdowns of nuclear power plants.) It
also assumed external exposure to radiation, but radioactive
contamination that is ingested, e.g. in drinking water, or
inhaled is far deadlier than external exposure to it. And
note
again
that radiation sickness is equal opportunity death. It
doesn't care about diversity; it kills regardless of sex or
race ... or political affiliation.
Even for the lowest radiation dosage/death rate given, 10% of
the population will be dead after 30 days, and more after
that. 10% of the millions of people in cities near a single
nuclear power plant is at least hundreds of thousands of
people dead.
"Near" is within 150 miles, as I explained in
Nuclear
9/11, the medically-advised radius around the Chernobyl
nuclear power plant the Russian government seriously
considered evacuating after the meltdown in 1986. The only
reason they didn't evacuate to this radius was that logistical
difficulty and appearances were more important to them than
the safety of the people. Sound familiar? In the U.S., the
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) only requires nuclear power
plants to plan for an evacuation radius of 10 miles. To limit
electric power losses due to transmission distances (I have a
B.S. from MIT
in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science), power
plants are built as close to population centers as possible.
Thus nuclear power plants are often built just a little more
than 10 miles from major cities.
Kiev, which had a population of about 2.5 million people in
1986 and was de facto evacuated, is about 65 miles from
Chernobyl, as the wind blows. In the mid-latitudes, as for
Russia and the U.S., winds generally blow east but can blow
north, south, or even west (I did
graduate
work in meteorology).
Kiev is also about 65 miles from Chernobyl as the water flows:
the Pripyat/Dnieper River. Again, cooling is one of the most
important things about nuclear power plants. Even nuclear
power plants with iconic cooling towers, or similar, require a
nearby lake, river, or ocean for cooling. The Chernobyl
nuclear power plant, which had no cooling towers, used the
Pripyat River, which flows into the Dnieper River that Kiev is
on, which meant it could carry radioactive contamination
there, which was a major concern.
In the U.S., east of the Appalachians, such as in North and
South Carolina, water generally flows east towards the
Atlantic Ocean (Gulf Stream) along rivers (and rivers turned
into lakes and reservoirs), where cities are usually
built.
Duke Energy operates
six nuclear power plants in the Carolinas
; three in North Carolina (NC)
— McGuire (2 reactors), Harris (1 reactor), and
Brunswick (2 reactors) — and three in South Carolina
(SC) — Catawba (2 reactors), Robinson (1 reactor), and
Oconee (3 reactors). Their distances (miles) by air (wind)
from the 13 most populous city areas (the given populations
are minimums) in the Carolinas are given in the table below,
keeping in mind that radioactive fallout that reaches a more
distant city may go through a nearer city and that even a 10%
death rate will mean tens or hundreds of thousands of dead
from radiation sickness.
City Area |
Population |
McGuire |
Catawba |
Harris |
Robinson |
Oconee |
Brunswick |
Charlotte NC |
2,660,000 |
15 |
15 |
110 |
65 |
115 |
180 |
Raleigh NC |
1,414,000 |
125 |
140 |
15 |
125 |
245 |
125 |
Greenville SC |
928,000 |
85 |
70 |
195 |
125 |
25 |
250 |
Columbia SC |
829,000 |
95 |
70 |
165 |
55 |
115 |
165 |
Charleston SC |
800,000 |
190 |
165 |
195 |
110 |
210 |
135 |
Greensboro NC |
777,000 |
80 |
100 |
55 |
115 |
190 |
170 |
Winston-Salem NC |
680,000 |
65 |
85 |
80 |
115 |
170 |
190 |
Durham NC |
543,000 |
115 |
140 |
25 |
125 |
235 |
150 |
Fayetteville NC |
527,000 |
115 |
125 |
40 |
85 |
220 |
85 |
Asheville NC |
469,000 |
85 |
85 |
195 |
155 |
55 |
275 |
Spartanburg SC |
328,000 |
65 |
45 |
170 |
110 |
55 |
225 |
Wilmington NC |
283,000 |
190 |
190 |
110 |
125 |
280 |
15 |
Florence SC |
206,000 |
100 |
95 |
110 |
25 |
180 |
95 |
Like Chernobyl, four of the six Duke Energy nuclear power
plants don't have cooling towers, or similar, and they all
require a nearby lake (including reservoirs and lakes made
from rivers), river, or ocean for cooling. If there are
meltdowns, these waterways will carry radioactive
contamination hundreds of miles to the Atlantic Ocean (Gulf
Stream) through densely populated areas, particularly
cities
, as follows.
McGuire: Lake Norman for cooling
⇒ Mountain Island Lake ⇒
Catawba River ⇒ by Charlotte NC
⇒ Lake Wylie ⇒ Catawba River
⇒ Fishing Creek Lake ⇒ Lake
Wateree ⇒ Wateree River ⇒
Lake Marion ⇒ Santee River ⇒
Atlantic Ocean (Gulf Stream) OR Lake Marion
⇒ Lake Moultrie ⇒ Cooper
River ⇒ through Charleston SC
⇒ Atlantic Ocean (Gulf Stream)
Catawba: Lake Wylie for cooling
⇒ Catawba River ⇒ Fishing
Creek Lake ⇒ Lake Wateree ⇒
Wateree River ⇒ Lake Marion
⇒ Santee River ⇒ Atlantic
Ocean (Gulf Stream) OR Lake Marion
⇒ Lake Moultrie ⇒ Cooper
River ⇒ through Charleston SC
⇒ Atlantic Ocean (Gulf Stream)
Harris: Harris Lake for cooling
⇒ Buckhorn Creek ⇒ Cape Fear
River ⇒ through Fayetteville NC
⇒ Cape Fear River ⇒ by
Wilmington NC ⇒ Cape Fear River
⇒ Atlantic Ocean (Gulf Stream)
Robinson: Lake Robinson for cooling
⇒ Black Creek ⇒ Prestwood
Lake ⇒ Black Creek ⇒ Little
Carr Creek ⇒ Great Pee Dee River
⇒ Waccamaw River ⇒ Atlantic
Ocean (Gulf Stream)
Oconee: Lake Keowee for cooling
⇒ Keowee River ⇒ Lake
Hartwell ⇒ Savannah River ⇒
through Augusta GA (population 611,000) ⇒
Savannah River ⇒ by Savannah GA (population
405,000) ⇒ Savannah River ⇒
Atlantic Ocean (Gulf Stream)
Brunswick: Cape Fear River for cooling
⇒ Atlantic Ocean (Gulf Stream)
Duke Energy's six nuclear power plants are old and already
unsafe, making hacking into them and forcing meltdowns even
easier.
After being constructed, mostly in the 1970s and 1980s, all
nuclear power plants in the U.S. were issued operating
licenses by the
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) that were good for 40 years,
the life expectancy of a nuclear power plant. After
experiencing the ever-increasing expense and difficulty in
constructing nuclear power plants, it was decided, well before
the 40 years were up, to renew these operating licenses for
another 20 years beyond the initial 40, i.e. 60 years total.
See the table below, which was compiled here with data
gathered from NRC records.
Duke Energy |
40-Year |
20-Year |
Nuclear |
Operating |
Renewed |
Power Plant |
License Issued |
License Issued |
License Expires |
McGuire |
Reactor 1 |
May 1981 |
Dec 2003 |
Mar 2041 |
Reactor 2 |
May 1983 |
Dec 2003 |
Mar 2043 |
Catawba |
Reactor 1 |
Jan 1985 |
Dec 2003 |
Dec 2043 [sic] |
Reactor 2 |
May 1986 |
Dec 2003 |
Dec 2043 [sic] |
Harris |
Reactor 1 |
Oct 1986 |
Dec 2008 |
Oct 2046 |
Robinson |
Reactor 1 |
Jul 1970 |
Apr 2004 |
Jul 2030 |
Oconee |
Reactor 1 |
Feb 1973 |
May 2000 |
Feb 2033 |
Reactor 2 |
Oct 1973 |
May 2000 |
Oct 2033 |
Reactor 3 |
Jul 1974 |
May 2000 |
Jul 2034 |
Brunswick |
Reactor 1 |
Sep 1976 |
Jun 2006 |
Sep 2036 |
Reactor 2 |
Dec 1974 |
Jun 2006 |
Dec 2034 |
Duke Energy's nuclear power plants, like all nuclear power
plants constructed in the 1970s and 1980s, have some major
age-related safety problems, making hacking into them and
forcing meltdowns even easier.
The fuel for nuclear power plants,
uranium
dioxide in zirconium tubes, does not last forever and has
to be replaced every few years. When it is, what is replaced,
now nuclear waste, is still highly radioactive and still needs
to be cooled or it can melt down or catch fire, spreading
radioactivity widely; this was one of the biggest problems at
Chernobyl.
These nuclear power plants were constructed in anticipation of
a large permanent nuclear waste storage facility, with only
limited temporary storage — spent fuel pools outside the
reactor
containment dome — constructed on-site at each
nuclear power plant. The Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste
Repository in Nevada was to be this large permanent nuclear
waste storage facility and was started in 1987, but was
essentially cancelled in 2011 by President Barack Obama,
without ever having stored any significant amount of nuclear
waste.
These nuclear power plants have thus had to cram their nuclear
waste in on-site spent fuel pools never designed to handle
that density of nuclear waste (densities close to that inside
a reactor). According to a report by Alvarez et al. in
Science and Global Security in 2003, "The long-term
land-contamination consequences of such an event [a spent fuel
pool fire] could be significantly worse than those from
Chernobyl."
Nuclear power plants, which generate electricity, have to have
electricity even when they are shut down, in order to continue
to cool the reactor, as well as the spent fuel pools. This
electricity is usually taken from the electrical grid, which
is just transmission lines controlled by networked computers.
As a recent multi-billion dollar infrastructure bill in
Congress pointed out, America's electrical grid is old and
decrepit, including in regards to security (see
CISA:
No Infrastructure Cybersecurity, Just a Stepping Stone for IT
Incompetents).
If hackers can get a nuclear power plant to just shut down
(which some have just for hurricanes; Brunswick for example),
they could force a meltdown by hacking the electrical grid
(see
Handing
Over America's Electrical Grid to the
Russians).
The
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the nuclear power
industry, as represented by the Nuclear Energy Institute
(NEI), claim to have a cybersecurity plan that will prevent
nuclear power plants from being hacked into. But a plan is
not the same thing as its implementation, which depends on the
qualifications of the implementors; that's the point
of
Stop IT
Incompetence. Do you really think
IT incompetent restaurant manager
Bonnie Titone
can protect you and yours from
hackers
under Russian President
Vladimir Putin
hacking into one or more Duke Energy
nuclear power plants and forcing meltdowns that will horribly
kill millions from radiation sickness?
Apscitu can protect you
and yours.