Dr. Thresher v. Prof. Dr. Lohmann
November 17, 2020
Dr. Thresher v. Prof. Dr. Lohmann was my (Dr. Duane
Thresher's) first foundational case; see
IT Law
Expertise in my
Credentials on
the
Apscitu website and
About
Apscitu Law and
Casebook on
the
Apscitu Law
website. This case was from when I was still in
academia,
doing
research at the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) in Germany.
My wife, Dr. Claudia Kubatzki, and I worked for
Prof. Dr. Gerrit Lohmann
, in his climate modeling
group.
Evidence in this case can be found in the article I wrote
about it,
Corrupt
German Climate Science, for my controversial website,
RealClimatologists.org (see
Climate
of Incompetence), particularly in the
lawyer email thread referred to in
that article.
Gerrit Lohmann was an incompetent scientist and to make up for
this in his career he had to be corrupt (see
Principles
of IT Incompetence (IT Hiring: IT Incompetence Breeds
Disloyalty and Corruption)). He was also an abusive boss
to both my wife and me — to the point of actively trying
to prevent us from getting new jobs — which was why we
left AWI, which supported his behavior.
Three years after we had left AWI, to help his career-critical
publication list Gerrit Lohmann got a paper published,
What
caused the mid-Holocene forest decline on the eastern
Tibet-Qinghai Plateau?, in the journal
Global Ecology
and Biogeography, published by Wiley-Blackwell (UK),
specifically Debbie Wright, and edited by
David Currie
of the University of Ottawa
(Canada). Lohmann, who didn't really contribute to the paper
(he doesn't even speak English, the language of science),
listed himself as an author, but also put my wife, Kubatzki,
as an author to give the paper badly-needed
credibility. (Another author was Chinese, who have little
regard for copyright law.)
However, my wife had no knowledge this paper was published and
had not, and would not have, consented to it; she only
accidentally came across the paper while updating her
publication list. Gerrit Lohmann had used her work, lied
about what it showed, and pretended to be her when submitting
to the journal and responding to peer reviewers, including
fabricating a signature and an email address for her; an
extreme violation of copyright law.
After enduring months of harassment by Gerrit Lohmann of my
wife, her new boss, me, and my new boss (at a
U.S. Department
of Defense facility), while arguing with all the corrupt
non-lawyers involved (editor, researchers, publisher), we
finally got to the lawyers: the incompetent AWI (Germany)
lawyer,
Christoph Ruholl
, and the competent Wiley-Blackwell
(UK) lawyer,
Sue Joshua
. We still had to argue with the
lawyers, but for a shorter time and with the result that we
got the paper retracted. (It's official title now has
"Retraction" at the beginning, although, as expected from a
corrupt incompetent, for years Lohmann deceitfully didn't
include that in the title in his publication list or in any
other way indicate the paper was retracted.) In academia,
having a paper retracted is extremely serious, often career
ending, so forcing a retraction is very hard to
do.
From this case I learned a lot of copyright law, including
international copyright law. Like much publishing nowadays,
scientific journals are published and used online so most of
this copyright law was applicable to IT. I also learned to
skip uselessly and endlessly arguing with all the non-lawyers
involved and get right to the lawyers.
[Update: While researching this article, I discovered the
unretracted version of the paper was still available on JSTOR,
one of the largest most-used digital libraries of academic
journals, and had been for years. This is a serious copyright
violation and we immediately contacted the JSTOR legal
department and threatened legal action against JSTOR. They
replaced it with the retracted version within a few
days.]